[OT] Signore e signori: la guerra.

[Azophfaz]

Cartoline per il ratto
https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/topnew ... 55e07.html

Ma come, Travaglio, Orsini e Azzoppas ci avevano assicurato con le loro notizie SUL CAMPO che la gloriosa Federazione Russa aveva già sconfitto i nazisti di Kiev.

ma tu stai come un babbuino che raschia i coglioni. La vera domanda da farsi è cosa perderà l'Ucraina alla fine della guerra? Sei in grado di quantificare quante risorse e parte del Paese è stata persa o verrà tagliata? Quanto è stato conveniente continuare, e se era meglio accordarsi prima per perdere meno territorio di quanto i russi si stanno prendendo adesso? Questa è la domanda che dovresti porti nel tuo piccolo e angusto ripostiglio, dal quale esci solo per citarmi attacchi o presunte controffensive che non cambiano nulla sul CAMPO, quello che manco sai dove si trova.

[Drogato_ di_porno]

dose quotidiana di circenses (senza il panem)

[estdipendente]

Cartoline per il ratto
https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/topnew ... 55e07.html

Ma come, Travaglio, Orsini e Azzoppas ci avevano assicurato con le loro notizie SUL CAMPO che la gloriosa Federazione Russa aveva già sconfitto i nazisti di Kiev.

soprattutto la gloriosa Federazione Russa e’ riuscita a demilitarizzare l’Ucraina:-)) un successone davvero. alla faccia del cazzo. sara’ la colonna portante dell’esercito europeo. trovo incredibile come minus habens come quelli che hai citato credano davvero che sia possibile mettersi d’accordo con la Russia. se la Russia ti prende di mira o chini la testa e ti rassegni alla poverta’ o ti ribelli e vieni attaccato e magari distrutto. non c’e’ una terza via purtroppo.
detto questo ti posto una lettura interessante:

- - - - - - - - - -

"The war in the Middle East may be consuming much of the world’s attention, but Russia’s war against Ukraine has not abated. It will not end until we make it cost President Vladimir Putin more than he believes it is worth.

Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine four years ago, the Kremlin has tried to make the world believe that the Russian economy is strong and that sanctions don’t work. The Swedish government disagrees, and has commissioned several studies by leading economists and intelligence services to uncover the truth behind Russia’s official statistics: The economy is more fragile than it appears.

Having an accurate picture of the state of the Russian economy is crucial. We can’t afford to underestimate Russia’s strength and its ability to harm Ukraine and NATO allies — by providing Iran with intelligence, for instance — but we must not overestimate it either.

There are several reasons to believe that Russia has been exaggerating its economic strength. Russia has claimed that its economy grew by around 13 percent between 2020 and 2024, but by measuring nighttime luminosity, an established way of assessing economic activity in countries where official statistics are not available or cannot be trusted, we have estimated that the economy actually contracted by around 8 percent during this period.

We also believe inflation is substantially understated. In 2024, when inflation in Russia was reportedly around 10 percent, the central bank raised the benchmark interest rate to 21 percent, suggesting that inflation was higher. And Sweden’s Military Intelligence and Security Service believes that it is higher than the current official forecast of around 5 percent. This would mean Russia is overstating its purchasing power, and that its military spending capacity is weaker than it appears.

A study published by the British government estimates that the overall losses to the Russian economy as a result of international sanctions amount to at least $450 billion since February 2022. The effect on sectors such as energy exports has been devastating: Russia’s energy revenues in January 2026, before the beginning of the war in Iran, were down by 50 percent from the same month the year before.

Russia is benefiting from the waiving of some sanctions because of the war in Iran and the near-total closure of the Strait of Hormuz, but Swedish intelligence estimates that Russia would need the average oil price for Urals oil to remain above $100 a barrel for the rest of the year to make a significant difference. The benefits to Russia have also been limited by Ukraine’s successful strikes on Russian oil refineries.

Not everyone agrees with Sweden’s assessment of Russia’s reporting on its economy, but there is growing agreement about the economy’s general fragility. Inside the country, elites are increasingly alarmed. Mr. Putin has acknowledged some weaknesses in the economy’s performance, and last month ordered officials to improve it. A Kremlin-friendly think tank, run by the brother of the Russian defense minister, recently warned of the risks of a systemic banking crisis this year. And last week, the economic growth forecast for 2026 was downgraded to 0.4 percent, despite rising oil prices.

Then there are Russia’s strategic failures in Ukraine. Advances at the front have almost ground to a halt, with Ukraine even regaining some territory. Russia’s casualty rates at the front are catastrophic. Russia has suffered 1.2 million casualties since the start of the invasion, by some estimates, an average of roughly 35,000 a month in 2025. Recruitment is increasingly expensive.

Ukraine is in a stronger position than it has been in a long time. It has given counterdrone assistance to the Gulf states in response to Iran’s attacks, and increased cooperation between Ukrainian and Western defense actors, such as weapons manufacturers, to develop and produce completely new kinds of defense matériel.

In April, the European Union made two important decisions to strengthen support for Ukraine and further increase the pressure on Russia: It greenlit a loan of 90 billion euros, or $106 billion, that will cover a significant part of Ukraine’s funding needs for 2026-2027 and approved a 20th package of sanctions against Russia.

The work cannot stop there. One measure in particular would make a tremendous difference: The introduction of a ban on providing maritime services — insurance, access to ports, financing and so on — to any ships leaving Russian ports carrying oil, gas or coal. Escalating from a price cap to an outright prohibition would deal a significant blow to the Kremlin’s war chest. Sweden would like to see the European Union, and ideally the rest of the Group of 7, impose this measure.

Russia’s economy, in nominal terms, is barely bigger than the State of New York’s, smaller than that of Texas and fragile. Russian households are feeling the pinch of daily expenses, and the lion’s share of the liquid assets in the country’s national wealth fund — its financial buffer — has been drained to finance the war. The weakness in the economy shows how effective Western sanctions have already been, and why further pressure is the best way to force Mr. Putin to engage in serious peace negotiations.

We can’t change Mr. Putin’s wish to control Ukraine, but we can change how much it will cost him."

Maria Malmer Stenergard is the Swedish minister for foreign affairs.

[Azophfaz]

[

soprattutto la gloriosa Federazione Russa e’ riuscita a demilitarizzare l’Ucraina:-)) un successone davvero. alla faccia del cazzo. sara’ la colonna portante dell’esercito europeo.

la colonna dell'esercito europeo di sto cazzo, di solito tutto quello che scrivi si fa l'opposto, peggio di salvini quindi non fare teorie del cazzo che succede sempre l'opposto di quel che scrivi, come il regime changing e tutte quelle minkiate, la controfffensiva ecc ecc..
l'esercito lo dovrà ridurre inevitabilmente per accordarsi di riffa o di raffa, e zelensky non credo decida, più il territorio che sarà smembrato, vedi a quanto è servito.
ma tu pensa pure che gli lasceranno tenere una forza militare di milioni di soldati. Mitomane..

[Azophfaz]

poi li voglio vedere i nuovi governi europei che stanno salendo al potere finanziare ancora un Paese corrotto e fallito, e di conseguenza il così detto esercito ucraino che dovrebbe essere la colonna come dice il mitomane.. Ma vediamo se la sua teoria si avvera come tutte le altre mirabolanti cazzate, tra il regime changing, invadiamo l'isola di sto cazzo ecc ecc